Lightweight PHP CMS – Revisiting Concrete5

Well I’ve now got to the point where the HTML template for the site is complete, so it’s time to implement it.  I had three of the previously identified CMSes up and running and I was going to implement the template in each of the products to get a feel for how easy it was to implement a HTML template into the CMS. 

Given my prior investigations, the order in which I was going to attempt this was the following:

  • TYPOlight
  • Silverstripe
  • Concrete5 (it’s still got me interested)

TYPOlight
Attempting to push the HTML template into TYPOlight felt like a pain in the butt.  The instructions are relatively clear, but the TYPOlight offers the ability to generate templates and customise CSS through the interface, and a lot of this functionality overcomplicates the process of importing a pregenerated HTML template.  Basically, as someone who is capable of creating a HTML template, I just want to get it in there and not have to muck around.  In short, template import abandoned at this stage – will come back to it if need be.

Silverstripe
Consulted documentation, clear enough but not compelling enough to implement after my experience with TYPOlight.

Concrete5
As I’d previously thought I wouldn’t be using Concrete5 I’m only investigating out of interest.  Sure enough though, it’s really simple (very similar implementation to wordpress).  To get started, I’d recommend having a look at the following screencast:

http://www.concrete5.org/index.php?cID=2878

I’ll provide a more detailed guide on simple templating if desired in a later post, but for now check out the screencast and run up Concrete5.

4 Responses to “Lightweight PHP CMS – Revisiting Concrete5”

  1. Ryan says:

    What did you end up using?

  2. Hey Ryan,

    Did some work with Concrete5 (it really is a pretty slick piece of kit), but in the end decided that the people I was putting the site together for were really comfortable with using WordPress already. So I worked with the template files in such a way that it really enabled me to build a fairly useful site with something that was extremely simple for a non-technical user to manage.

    If the site was any more complicated than a simple brochure-ware site though I suspect I would have definitely kept going with a C5 implementation.

    Cheers,
    Damon.

  3. Ryan says:

    Man fast reply. Thanks for the write-up on your experiences. Did you take a look at MODx? You’ve pretty much covered everything else I’ve been looking at.

  4. Ryan says:

    Ah I found your post about MODx and CMSMS. Guess they didn’t make the cut.

Leave a Reply